From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 17:16:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E94016A421 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1401F13C45A for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FB9EBC84; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:58:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:58:47 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" Message-Id: <20071120115847.e3052dbc.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20071120094009.B630@prime.gushi.org> References: <20071120094009.B630@prime.gushi.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.4 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's "unknown" about i386-unknown? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:16:10 -0000 In response to "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" : > Hey all. > > I see i386-unknown as a build target all the time. > > So my (possibly silly) question is: what's the unknown variable here? And > why isn't it? I seem to remember a conversation about this, and that the original spec for that string required a "physical location" after the architecture. I'm guessing that at the time it was very important to know which of the few physical machines did the job. If my memory is reliable, it's not that the information is "unknown", it's just that nobody cares any more, therefore nobody bothers to enter the physical location information. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com