From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  6 09:23:19 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA00277
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 09:23:19 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA00268
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 09:23:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA20062;
	Sat, 6 Feb 1999 09:23:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: "Benjamin Greenwald" <beng@lcs.mit.edu>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Naming branches 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 Feb 1999 12:20:53 EST."
             <199902061720.MAA23438@miris.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 09:23:11 -0800
Message-ID: <20058.918321791@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

It works fine out of the box.  Upgrading is just more work if you're
pre-ELF.

> Hi all,
> 
> Perhaps we should consider, in the future, not puting the -stable name on a
> branch until we feel it's really stable.  Perhaps we should call a new
> release branch -development or -releng initially.  At least you won't end up
> with people saying "Why doesn't this work out of the box ... after all it's
> a 'stable' branch?!"
> 
> -Ben Greenwald
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message