From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 18:48:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA5E16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:48:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B679F43D2D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:48:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-239-170.zoominternet.net [24.154.239.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8TImGex004803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:48:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:48:59 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Maxim Konovalov Message-Id: <20040929144859.3e932576@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040929224017.K11164@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <20040929222559.T11104@mp2.macomnet.net> <20040929143825.6774d946@localhost> <20040929224017.K11164@mp2.macomnet.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: doc tree state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:48:19 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:45:29 +0400 (MSD) Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, 14:38-0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:27:56 +0400 (MSD) > > Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > > Maxim my old friend, hope you are well. > > > > > Please excuse my ignorance but what is the current state of the doc > > > tree? Is it allowed to commit there? TIA. > > > > We have a doc "slush" where new content is "carefully introduced" > > at the "discretion" of the person committing the change. This is > > to help keep translators from getting too far behind the English > > version. Of course, if you were to ask me what 'defines' good > > and bad commits during these times, I'd look at you blankly. > > Just a couple of patches for our mirrors list. It it OK to commit > them? These look correct at just an eye glance, if you can run make and get no errors then please commit. :) -- Tom Rhodes