From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 19 22:15:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3384816A4DA for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nock@email.arizona.edu) Received: from smtpgate.email.arizona.edu (deagol.email.Arizona.EDU [128.196.133.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC87643D6A for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:15:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nock@email.arizona.edu) Received: from localhost (legolas.email.arizona.edu [10.0.0.224]) by smtpgate.email.arizona.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923BFF39B20 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:15:26 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.10.10.202] (ip70-171-228-190.tc.ph.cox.net [70.171.228.190]) by smtpgate.email.arizona.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10405F39868 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:15:25 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <44E78D75.2020405@email.arizona.edu> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:15:17 -0700 From: Shawn Nock User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060625) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <1155621521.1050.3.camel@redevil.savola.com> <20060818170631.GQ80808@e.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20060818170631.GQ80808@e.0x20.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=B64200E1; url=http://www.u.arizona.edu/~nock/pub.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at email.arizona.edu Subject: Re: Java seg faults on -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:15:34 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lars Engels wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 08:58:41AM +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote: >> I noticed that when I try to invoke javac or java from the command line >> on -CURRENT it segfaults, has anyone noticed the same thing on -CURRENT? >> I tried it on two different machines and it is the case on both! I noticed this a few weeks ago... I figured that since the packages were built for STABLE that COMPAT_43 was biting me again (The removal of COMPAT_43 caused a lot of 6-packages to segfault on my current machine). I compiled from ports those apps that I couldn't get a CURRENT package for; that fixed the segfaults, and since I never really use java I just removed it (as the port has been updated to grab the foundations package). If you need java you could probably still build it from source by grabbing the source / binary downloads from sun and patching / compiling yourself. (I'll wait until the packages are updated.) Shawn - -- Shawn Nock (OpenPGP: 0xB64200E1) Broadcast Engineer; KUAT Communications Group University of Arizona nock 'at ' arizona 'dot' edu - -- "Despair leads to boredom, electronic games, computer hacking, poetry, and other bad habits." -Edward Abbey -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE5411wcVctbZCAOERAqhVAKCVtcziH11XoCNX39hS+K6DRaRLYwCgzvzp A4YT3hdNOhkygyiYbF0uI2I= =ze1l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----