From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 4 19:10:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFDC1065677; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08098FC2F; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m24JAFVs067542; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:10:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m24JAFFP067541; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:10:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:10:15 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: "David E. O'Brien" Message-ID: <20080304191015.GA67271@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <200803041900.m24J0BK0036475@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803041900.m24J0BK0036475@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:10:50 -0000 On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:00:11PM +0000, David E. O'Brien wrote: > obrien 2008-03-04 19:00:11 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > share/mk sys.mk > Log: > Back out revision 1.97, which backed out part of revision 1.96. > Change the default CFLAGS to match the simple defaults that the > tinderboxes use. By using -fno-strict-aliasing by default we are > choosing to ignore problems in code which had the potential to > shoot ourselves in the foot. > Does this change propagate into the ports collection make infrastructure? There are several ports that require -fno-strict-aliasing. -- Steve