From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 29 07:58:17 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9F216A4E1
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:58:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from regnauld@catpipe.net)
Received: from moof.catpipe.net (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598D143D6A
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:58:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from regnauld@catpipe.net)
Received: from localhost (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130])
	by localhost.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F356340C2;
	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:58:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from moof.catpipe.net ([195.249.214.130])
	by localhost (moof.catpipe.net [195.249.214.130]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 35688-08; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:58:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vinyl.catpipe.net (vinyl.catpipe.net [195.249.214.189])
	by moof.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F37E6340F5;
	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:57:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by vinyl.catpipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1006)
	id 9608378C31; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:57:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:57:27 +0200
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net>
To: eculp@bafirst.com
Message-ID: <20060829075727.GD20989@catpipe.net>
References: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> <44F3429F.6050204@FreeBSD.org>
	<44F344FA.1000408@elischer.org>
	<20060828195339.GF37035@funkthat.com>
	<44F362C0.6080309@elischer.org> <44F37063.6010302@elischer.org>
	<20060828182947.p8ylw4x48oko00kg@mail.bafirst.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060828182947.p8ylw4x48oko00kg@mail.bafirst.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE i386
Organization: catpipe Systems ApS
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at catpipe.net
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:58:17 -0000

eculp@bafirst.com (eculp) writes:
> 
> I assume that you have seen the following:
> 
> http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views

	That is definitely the right way to do it imho.

> I found it interesting although I haven't had time to give it a try 
> especially since I'm thinking about leaving bind9 for djbdns and 
> ldap2dns even though I've never been crazy about djbdns and family.

	djbdns is ok as long as you don't plan on using IPv6, EDNS0 or DNSSEC.

	Phil