From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 18 10:49:39 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1D116A419;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jp@tns.cz)
Received: from bns.tns.cz (bns.tns.cz [213.194.214.115])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8739D13C458;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jp@tns.cz)
Received: from bns.tns.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bns.tns.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FEC55F56E;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:49:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bonifac.tns.cz (bertik [192.168.144.14])
	by bns.tns.cz with ESMTP id 4FEB2O40014IRYQT309;
	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:49:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bonifac.tns.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id DF3C8F1B92; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:50:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:50:24 +0100
From: Josef Pojsl <jp@tns.cz>
To: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
Message-ID: <20080218105024.GA1080@bonifac.tns.cz>
References: <jV/l2UkZT+CCNuE6npJv1SBs5CE@UCvaDHSF+GDEPQ7TSpdR+lgUSQM>
	<20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<Ntfg81bhcEB6BPmKzMb2iTN9oBA@ebJhc+9glC7W5vxxBJVH9quBZr0>
	<BeIqwBu0LkRXuGRr9c834oJe11M@mkgs2gFQr6GPddtmfyJSxMBvIxA>
	<20080208105357.GF1142@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<BT4TiDDxXXg+A3Hm/RZG4ajuso0@iW7JDlNxJglv8iYoJTWnPBJ0iaQ>
	<20080213203012.GB1157@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<mgxG59t6NyZOK/aOCUXqAa4UjwQ@nlDRp1tQLLdsXUKSIGNiprMk72M>
	<i/Lmkx/GjpxzqLdQCjJf243w/hg@7sDP7kkrk5jQp0SODPrr0/WdZZY>
	<5ZtxcL6cRo84tm1uYJcECu4DBCo@49l6neKHPg6j4SHeejH198Klzys>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5ZtxcL6cRo84tm1uYJcECu4DBCo@49l6neKHPg6j4SHeejH198Klzys>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, farrokhi@FreeBSD.org,
	Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>
Subject: Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:49:39 -0000

Hello Eygene,

On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:11:04PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> I should more carefully study current OpenBSD CVS: the fix for your
> problem was committed 5 months ago.  Claudio mentioned it (and he
> is the author of the patch itself), but the fix didn't get into 4.2.
> 
> The funny thing is that I had wrote simular (but lower quality) fix
> for the problem today and decided to look at the current OpenOSPFD
> code.  And looking at the last revision of ospfd/rde_spf.c I had
> found calls to calc_nexthop() that were very simular to mine ones ;))
> 
> OK, to the point: the inlined patch should go to the 'files'
> directory, named 'patch-p2p_interfaces'.  I assume that all my
> previous patches to make 4.2 to compile and run were applied.

Thaks a lot, I have applied that patch and it works!
Ospfctl shows the right interface and routing table is correct as well.

I have tried that for my simple config with two machines
and two gre interfaces. The big picture of my test network
includes six machines and about twelve interfaces,
so I am about to spread that patch and start tests
of the whole thing.

Thanks again,
--
Josef