From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 23 15:57:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.urx.com (mail.urx.com [63.170.19.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD3F37B423 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:57:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@urx.com) Received: from urx.com [206.159.132.160] by mail.urx.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A34F650274; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:57:19 -0700 Message-ID: <3AE4B34F.BA846BE1@urx.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:57:19 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roelof Osinga Cc: G D McKee , Questions FreeBSD Subject: Re: M$ NetMeeting References: <020c01c0cc26$b74a5760$0500a8c0@gdmckee.local> <3AE4B23E.4E88432F@nisser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Roelof Osinga wrote: > > G D McKee wrote: > > > > ... > > Does anyone have any ideas? I am only interested in getting NetMeeting > > working from one PC inside my LAN. > > The thing whith proprietary software is, is that it's designed to > lock users in. Hear what you want is possible with M$'s Catapult. Part of the problem is that xxx-323 (or whatever it is protocol) isn't designed to be nat-able. Your address is included and if your system is setup like mine is, the people on the other end try to link to my internal 192.x.x.x IP instead of the external one. Kent > > Roelof > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message