From owner-freebsd-current  Thu May 16 15:52:49 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from omega.lovett.com (omega.lovett.com [209.249.90.123])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5947637B404; Thu, 16 May 2002 15:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [24.243.55.247] (helo=[10.0.0.2] ident=ident)
	by omega.lovett.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
	id 178U75-0005Sz-00; Thu, 16 May 2002 15:52:47 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 17:52:45 -0500
Subject: Re: __FreeBSD_version bump for loss of perl
From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
To: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>, <current@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <B909A26D.F27D%ade@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020516224641.GB496@elvis.mu.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On 05/16/02 17:46, "Maxime Henrion" <mux@freebsd.org> wrote:
> I agree that a __FreeBSD_version bump is appropriate, but why not always
> simply use sed for this ?

Because not everyone using the ports system has the in-place editing feature
of sed that was recently added, and thus it needs to be conditional on
${OSVERSION}.

-aDe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message