From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 11 13:50:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nisser.com (c0039.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887D337B423 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 13:50:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Received: from eboa.com (roelof [10.0.0.2]) by nisser.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA72151; Fri, 11 May 2001 22:50:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@eboa.com) Message-ID: <3AFC5081.E8451AFC@eboa.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 22:50:09 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eBOA - Programming the Web X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What gives? References: <3AF9F4E8.52A31C48@eboa.com> <20010510050737.A2285@xor.obsecurity.org> <3AFB3C14.A6FB45AA@eboa.com> <20010510222936.A15908@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > > ... > There's nothing wrong with the xemacs21 port. You could go and fetch > the package to prove this (if the port was broken, the package > wouldn't build). Granted that the xemacs example was a bad one. But never mind, I've already been asked, off-list, to stop wasting that persons time in this manner. Might as well, I guess. Roelof PS a package only shows that that specific port could be build with those specific options at that specific time. PPS ok, I need to work some on my resolve -- _______________________________________________________________________ eBOAź est. 1982 http://eBOA.com/ tel. +31-58-2123014 mailto:info@eBOA.com?subject=Information_request fax. +31-58-2160293 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message