From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 1 09:24:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA20375 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:24:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alcatel.fr (ns.rfs.tm.fr [194.133.58.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA20362 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:24:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr) From: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr Received: from alcatel.fr (gatekeeper-ssn.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.244]) by mailgate.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id TAA02247; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 19:22:34 +0100 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id SAA04818; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:21:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA21175; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:07:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr by telss1 (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA08545; Tue, 1 Dec 98 18:11:33 +0100 Received: from localhost by telspace.alcatel.fr with SMTP (1.40.112.12/16.2) id AA169311846; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:04:06 +0100 X-Openmail-Hops: 1 Date: Tue, 1 Dec 98 18:03:59 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <36641E14.F733E4C4@seattleu.edu> Subject: Re: 2.2.7 - 2.2.8 - 3.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 To: hodeleri@seattleu.edu Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, roberto.nunnari@agie.ch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="Re:" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Re:" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I had one yesterday !!!! it was 3.0-Current with Xfree86 3.3.3 and three compute-bound processes I'm going to investigate it a bit further TfH > 3.0 is "stable" in the sense that it works (I have to run it for my AIC 78xx > SCSI.) 3.0 is not "stable" in the sense that it can crash more easily than > 2.2.8-RELEASE (not that I have yet had a crash.) > > Eric Hodel > hodeleri@seattleu.edu > > nunnari wrote: > > > > Hi Keith, > > > > Why don't use 3.0? > > It's right the one I just installed... > > ...Maybe I should have asked before downloading it during the past week!!! > > Isn't 3.0 stable? > > > > Keith Anderson wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > On 01-Dec-98 nunnari wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > > could anybody tell me what are the main differences between > > > > 2.2.7 - 2.2.8 - 3.0 ??? > > > > > > 2.2.7-RELEASE A good stabe version > > > 2.2.8-RELEASE todays new release with some security things reworked > > > 3.0-RELEASE don't use it unless U have run 2.2.7-Release for 12 months > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > > > which should be the more stable? > > > > which should offer the best performance > > > > and which should offer the best develop environment? > > > > > > > > Thanks and bye. > > > > Robi. > > > > WWW : www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/3935 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > > --- > > > ---------------------------------- > > > E-Mail: Keith Anderson > > > Date: 01-Dec-98 > > > Time: 21:33:08 > > > Satelite Service 64K to 2Meg > > > This message was sent by XFMail > > > ---------------------------------- > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message