Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Dec 2006 01:13:43 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        JAroslav Suchanek <jarda@grisoft.cz>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: shmget regression?
Message-ID:  <20061201011311.P79653@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061130164220.GA1603@jardas.grisoft.cz>
References:  <20061130131143.GA31809@jardas.grisoft.cz> <20061130134403.P41812@fledge.watson.org> <20061130164220.GA1603@jardas.grisoft.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, JAroslav Suchanek wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:45:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, JAroslav Suchanek wrote:
>>
>>> 	I've tried to post PR, but it seems it got lost somewhere.
>>>
>>> 	I just wonder whether there was some change in shmget behavior in
>>> 	current.
>>>
>>> 	Look at this patch to src/sys-cur/tools/regression/sysvshm/shmtest.c
>>
>> Can you send the output of 'ipcs' after the below code runs so that I can 
>> see the mode it ended up being created with?  You might try reverting the 
>> priv(9) change to sysv_ipc.c and see if that fixes thanks?
>
> 	Yop, the revert helped, I've used CVS revision 1.27.4.1 of the 
> sysv_ipc.c.

Thanks -- I'll investigate this tomorrow in detail.  I've grabbed ownership of 
the PR you filed, also.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061201011311.P79653>