From owner-freebsd-audit Fri Jul 5 10:25:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393B137B400; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A93543E31; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g65HProi074897; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:25:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g65HPee7074892; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:25:40 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Akinori MUSHA Cc: Tim Robbins , Peter Pentchev , audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: suidperl Message-ID: <20020705102540.A74822@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Akinori MUSHA , Tim Robbins , Peter Pentchev , audit@FreeBSD.ORG References: <86sn2zpzmp.wl@daemon.musha.org> <20020704221031.A53275@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020704121413.GB382@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20020704225009.A54167@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <86r8ijpkuv.wl@daemon.musha.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <86r8ijpkuv.wl@daemon.musha.org>; from knu@iDaemons.org on Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:35:04AM +0900 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:35:04AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > By the way, do we really need a perl wrapper in the first place? I > suppose we can tweak ports/lang/perl5 to create symlinks (for example) > when NO_PERL_SYMLINKS is not defined. This question really needs to be decided on. Not being a Perl-head I don't feel qualified to have an opinion. But we do seem to be lacking a little leadership here. If we are going to have a wrapper, using `mailwrapper' may be better as it is more exact and does not depend on one's PATH setting. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message