From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 1 22:13:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB7E1065670; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323BA8FC16; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de ([10.1.1.7]) by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m61MDWtI074965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:13:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m61MDOXl009598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:13:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m61MDOXS029023; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:13:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m61MDN9N029022; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:13:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:13:23 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Bakul Shah Message-ID: <20080701221323.GE17364@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <20080701200254.GB17364@cicely7.cicely.de> <20080701213006.37D675B4B@mail.bitblocks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080701213006.37D675B4B@mail.bitblocks.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 7.0-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on spamd.cicely.de Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: It's 2008. 1 TB disk drives cost $160. Quotas are 32-bit. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:13:38 -0000 On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 02:30:06PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:02:54 +0200 Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:59:31AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > > > To bring this back on topic, perhaps John Kobuzik can just > > > use the zfs since it already has quota support? For example, > > > > > > # zfs create z/foo > > > # zfs quota=10M z/foo > > > dd < /dev/zero bs=1M count=20 > /z/foo/xx > > > dd: stdout: Disc quota exceeded > > > 11+0 records in > > > 10+0 records out > > > 10485760 bytes transferred in 4.718700 secs (2222171 bytes/sec) > > > # zfs set quota=10T z/foo > > > # zfs get quota z/foo > > > NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE > > > z/foo quota 10T local > > > > This is basicly what the partition size is for normal filesystems, > > with the great ability of course to change it cheaply at any time. > > But this is in no way a per user quota in the way ufs does. > > It is not the same but can serve a similer purpose if each > user gets his own filesystem (and yes, I am aware of the > rebooting issue with zfs with thousands of filesystems). He > wanted support for 2TB+ quota on ufs by July 20. If that > doesn't happen at least he can limp along with this. This works for home, but not for /tmp, where you may need support for user quota as well. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.