From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 9 04:29:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA28036 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 9 May 1997 04:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iceberg.anchorage.net. (root@iceberg.anchorage.net [207.14.72.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA28031 for ; Fri, 9 May 1997 04:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aak.anchorage.net (ai-132 [207.14.72.132]) by iceberg.anchorage.net. (8.6.11/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA19824; Fri, 9 May 1997 02:26:20 -0800 Date: Fri, 9 May 1997 03:19:19 -0800 (AKDT) From: Steve Howe X-Sender: abc@aak.anchorage.net To: Bryce Newall cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: rz/sz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 8 May 1997, Bryce Newall wrote: > the rzsz patch on my system, and am running into a slight problem. Any > > [51]root@voyager:/usr/ports/comms/rzsz # make NO_CHECKSUM=yes > ===> Extracting for rzsz-3.44 > ===> rzsz-3.44 depends on executable: unzip - found > ===> Patching for rzsz-3.44 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for rzsz-3.44 > 2 out of 18 hunks failed--saving rejects to rz.c.rej > *** Error code 2 yes - get zmtx-zmrx instead. rzsz is a Linux hack, and i had problems with it too (needed gmake, etc). zmtx-zmrx is smaller and better imho. the docs are fun to read in addition! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sleep: a sign a caffeine deprivation ... http://www.anchorage.net/~un_x -------------------------------------------------------------------------