From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 30 17:03:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA05781 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jun 1998 17:03:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from megaweapon.zigg.com (ip196.grand-rapids3.mi.pub-ip.psi.net [38.27.90.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA05732 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 1998 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@megaweapon.zigg.com) Received: from megaweapon.zigg.com (megaweapon.zigg.com [192.168.1.1]) by megaweapon.zigg.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA05450 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 1998 20:03:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matt@megaweapon.zigg.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 20:03:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Behrens To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: routing problem? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After messing with PPP over TCP for some time and almost blaming PPP for it, I stumbled upon a rather odd quirk. First of all, should the following be happening in a routing table: Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 192.168 192.168.250.1 UGSc 0 23 tun0 when the route is actually 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.250.1? I ask this because after messing with this for several days, I found out that if I do $ route add 192.168.0.1 192.168.250.1 then it works! Great, but the reason I'm doing PPP over TCP in the first place is to link two geographically separated LAN's cheaply. Am I doing something wrong? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message