From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 30 14:23:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CB3106564A for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from fep17.mx.upcmail.net (fep17.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416688FC0A for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge01.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20101030142311.CVRO1489.viefep17-int.chello.at@edge01.upcmail.net> for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:23:11 +0200 Received: from pinky ([213.46.23.80]) by edge01.upcmail.net with edge id R2P91f00W1jgp3H012PA3t; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:23:11 +0200 X-SourceIP: 213.46.23.80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <40bff08b3502166b8e1e21c7df2a584c.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:23:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <40bff08b3502166b8e1e21c7df2a584c.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32) X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=xhnIrgVimuy9wQ+RkywzulFXCq7zNkI+ObDjxzBho7Y= c=1 sm=0 a=bgpUlknNv7MA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=g0Bw0ZckIVQTDjliJQ0A:9 a=5JmAKO6Z8RZXzkf0NMEeDz1yA7oA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=0LrJM50PVI8A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Subject: Re: jdk16 vs openjdk X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:23:14 -0000 On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:57:04 +0200, wrote: > Hi, > > can someone clarify the status of jdk16 vs. openjdk16? > > At what patchlevel (in terms of JSE6_uXX) is the diablo-jdk16 download at > the FreeBSD-foundation? > > Will it get updated to the latest patchlevel (u22) any time? > > Or should one just use OpenJDK16? > > > Best Regards, > Rainer I would bet on openjdk6. As it is already much more up-to-date than jdk16. I think openjdk6 gets more love. :-) Ronald.