From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 4 03:26:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E800116A40F for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 03:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from mail.uct.ac.za (mail.uct.ac.za [137.158.128.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264DA43CA5 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 03:26:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@lordcow.org) Received: from lhc.phy.uct.ac.za ([137.158.37.93]) by mail.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1Gr4Ti-0002Sq-7z for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:26:50 +0200 Received: from lordcow by lhc.phy.uct.ac.za with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gr4Tl-00028k-V4 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:26:53 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:26:53 +0200 From: gareth To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20061204032653.GA8203@lordcow.org> Mail-Followup-To: ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20061204022115.GA7142@lordcow.org> <20061204023011.GA51889@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061204023644.GA7226@lordcow.org> <20061204030400.GA52211@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061204030400.GA52211@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Re: portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:26:52 -0000 On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:04), Kris Kennaway wrote: > Let's move this to the correct mailing list (note reply-to)... sure, the original question then since we've moved lists: On Mon 2006-12-04 (04:21), gareth wrote: > hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anything? this's the session: > > # portversion -l "<" > gnupg < > p5-Compress-Zlib < > p5-IO-Socket-SSL < > p5-PathTools < > portupgrade < > rsync < > spamass-milter < > # portupgrade -aF > What does portversion -l '<' -v say about the old and new versions? # portversion -l '<' -v gnupg-1.4.5_1 < needs updating (port has 1.4.5_2) p5-Compress-Zlib-1.42 < needs updating (port has 2.001) p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.01 < needs updating (port has 1.02) p5-PathTools-3.23 < needs updating (port has 3.24) portupgrade-2.1.3.3_1,2 < needs updating (port has 2.2.2,2) rsync-2.6.8_2 < needs updating (port has 2.6.9) spamass-milter-0.3.1_1 < needs updating (port has 0.3.1_3)