From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 11 04:44:56 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA10588 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 04:44:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from solaris.matti.ee (solaris.matti.ee [194.126.98.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA10574 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 04:44:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vallo@myhakas.matti.ee) Received: from myhakas.matti.ee (myhakas.matti.ee [194.126.114.87]) by solaris.matti.ee (8.8.8/8.8.8.s) with ESMTP id OAA18223; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:44:47 +0200 (EET) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by myhakas.matti.ee (8.9.2/8.9.1) id OAA45732; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:44:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo) Message-ID: <19990211144449.A45575@matti.ee> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:44:49 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: mi@aldan.algebra.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: umount -f Reply-To: vallo@matti.ee References: <19990210104842.A21617@relay.nuxi.com> <199902101854.NAA10601@misha.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199902101854.NAA10601@misha.cisco.com>; from Mikhail Teterin on Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 01:54:53PM -0500 Organization: =?iso-8859-15?Q?AS_Matti_B=FCrootehnika?= Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 01:54:53PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Nope: > > mi@xxx:/tmp (1044) umount -f -t nfs phosphorus:/phosphorus > umount: /phosphorus: Device busy > > It is not, that umount hangs, it is that it cares about the device being > busy despite `-f' flag. Or so it seems... send-pr? Do you have "hard" mount or "soft" mount? I have seen such behavior for "hard" mounts. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message