From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 12 16:55:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8FF16A41F; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:55:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AC443D46; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:55:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8CGtJRe094330; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:55:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j8CGtJr9094329; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:55:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:55:18 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050912165518.GA94181@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20050911002229.51F4916A471@hub.freebsd.org> <432382BC.5080105@root.org> <200509110310.36423@harrymail> <43255152.3000609@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43255152.3000609@freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf kern.post.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:55:20 -0000 On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:58:42AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > Emanuel Strobl wrote: > > Hmm, why was default size of root changed to 500M? > > Because I was increasing the sizes of /tmp and /var at the same time; because > I know that some users do somehow manage to fill up /; and because re@ told > me to. :-) Perhaps we should follow what SGI and Sun has done for years on its workstations: a combined / + /var + /usr. We would make it 15GB and be done with it. My laptop has a combined /+/var+/usr of 12GB and I have multiple kernels installed and room in swap for a crashdump. No need to reply you hate this idea - just one opinion that there are other partitioning schemes (especially now that we have a dynamic /) successfully used. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)