From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 16 09:20:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDDADB3 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D98129E9 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r8G9K1HO067934 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r8G9K1JY067933; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:20:01 GMT Message-Id: <201309160920.r8G9K1JY067933@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "freebsd@omnilan.de" Subject: Re: conf/181681: periodic inline security output missing with daily_show_success=NO X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "freebsd@omnilan.de" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:20:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/181681; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "freebsd@omnilan.de" To: Jason Unovitch Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/181681: periodic inline security output missing with daily_show_success=NO Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:09:45 +0200 Bezüglich Jason Unovitch's Nachricht vom 04.09.2013 02:21 (localtime): > Harald, > By any chance do you have a work around for the original broken > version of 450.status.security in 9.1-RELEASE? I submitted PR conf/178611 Hello Jason, sorry for that late reply, just want to let you know that I don't have anything further arround and unfortunately haven't looked into your conf/178611 yet. > for a patch in 9.1-RELEASE and have been using the patched version > successfully with the same options ever since. I have also tested > 9.2-RC3 and do not see the issue described. Additionally, 6 lines > below the suggested patch the "rc=1" used get overridden anyway by an Couldn't you reproduce the problem from your PR (conf/178611) with 9.2-RC3 or the probleme here (conf/181681)? The problem here is clearly „by design“ and should be seen unconditionally. Thanks, -Harry