From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat May 18 22:20:25 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA24140
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 18 May 1996 22:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whisker.cdrom.com (jkh-sl0-w.cdrom.com [204.216.27.194])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA24132
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 May 1996 22:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by whisker.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA03243; Sat, 18 May 1996 21:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199605190452.VAA03243@whisker.cdrom.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: whisker.cdrom.com: Host localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@caip.rutgers.edu>, nate@sri.MT.net,
        imp@village.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Note from Usenet 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 May 1996 12:24:19 PDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960518122247.1864A-100000@onyx.nervosa.com> 
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 21:52:33 -0700
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@whisker.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Does Linus provide benefits and stock options? He seems to think he is 
> the CEO, heh.

Linus is the principle architect for the kernel and hence entirely
justified in setting the release numbers.  The linux camp seems to
like the arrangement, so what's the problem?

					Jordan