Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 18:07:15 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Troubles with telnet encryption enabling. Message-ID: <VhZehQmOX2@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <9509281427.AA17677@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>; from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:27:23 -0400 References: <199509280622.IAA16335@grumble.grondar.za> <YiWIbQmGJ1@ache.dialup.demos.ru> <9509281427.AA17677@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <9509281427.AA17677@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Garrett A.
Wollman writes:
><<On Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:54:08 +0300 (MSK), =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> said:
>> No, encryption is separated from kerberos there, they must go
>> independently (see "encrypt" command inside telnet too).
>> It looks like client send encryption requests
>> and daemon receive and parse them, but does nothing...
>In what key do you expect to get your data encrypted?
>That's why an authentication mechanism is required: it's what provides
>the shared secret session key.
Oops. Thanx, I was under impression that keys can be exchanged
somehow else...
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?VhZehQmOX2>