From owner-cvs-all Mon Aug 30 16:17:53 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090E8157F2; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:17:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (iras-3-39.ucdavis.edu [169.237.17.39]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16044; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:17:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id QAA61076; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:17:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:17:40 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/mkdir mkdir.1 mkdir.c Message-ID: <19990830161739.D25026@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <199908302037.WAA31061@gratis.grondar.za> <199908302112.OAA66970@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: <199908302112.OAA66970@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Just as soon as Michael Hoek responds to just ONE of the emails One reason Michael *HARO* has be quiet is due to my advice. He is a quiet person and a newer committer that usually works on Ports. It was obvious after the first comments that some people may want to make this into a huge deal. > I might consider letting it die. But has anyone noticed he seems > to be silient on this list. Is he reading his commit mail? Would > he care to answer my very direct and simply 3 original questions? > > I've given him 48 hours since my comment, I now see 2 other folks > also objecting to mkdir -v (It just took time for them to catch > up, many don't read email over the weekend). I have sighted it does > not make us compatible with fileutils 4.0, which was one claim by > someone else. > > The commit to rm broke the build of -current for 24 hours :-( SO WHAT? I need to take my shoes off to count the number of times -CURRENT has been broken this month. AND it was for much less than 24hrs. See the commit logs. > I have no problem with the -v to cp, good technical arguments where > made for it, _and_ it makes us compatible to fileutils 4.0. Similar > reasoning applies to rm, but not mkdir. mkdir,rmdir was added to the "-v" list for orthogonality. Maybe that makes sense, maybe it doesn't. Had the original response to the commits been calm and made concessions like this, I would have said something earlier. But based on the below comments.... need I say more of the way some of the mails have been lately..... > In 12 more hours I intend to revert the code on mkdir unless he steps > forward and at least makes a comment. EXACTLY why mharo and I have been quiet. It didn't seem to take much fuel added to this fire to really blow things up. > If he does not make a comment I have to assume he is not reading > commit mail and intend to ask that his commit access be suspended, > as that has never been allowed. (Is this in the rules yet??) Must... hold.... back....., must.... hold.... tightly..... GrrrrRRRRRR. I'll let others comment on these last two proposals. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message