Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:05:22 +0400 From: Alex Kapranoff <kapr@acm.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Building only a specified list of kernel modules Message-ID: <20010326230522.A5834@kapran.bitmcnit.bryansk.su> In-Reply-To: <200103261709.f2QH9Q937241@harmony.village.org>; from imp@harmony.village.org on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:09:26AM -0700 References: <20010325234525.B484@kapran.bitmcnit.bryansk.su> <20010324211140.C4304@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010324205005.D777@nebula.cybercable.fr> <20010325101657.A36335@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010325120046.F777@nebula.cybercable.fr> <20010325234525.B484@kapran.bitmcnit.bryansk.su> <200103261709.f2QH9Q937241@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:09:26AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20010325234525.B484@kapran.bitmcnit.bryansk.su> Alex Kapranoff writes: > : Hm? You usually don't have a box with all the hundred NICS supported by > : FreeBSD EXCEPT FOR ONE, but instead a box with one or several NICS so > : that all other if_* modules waste your '/'. Same about snd_* drivers. It > : seems to be more practical to have a list of needed modules. I have a > : patch almost identical to Peter's in my tree for about a month and it > : speeds up kernel builds by a factor of 2 or more. > > Alex, > did you see my simplified patches? Yep. You see, I'm writing this using kernel built with your patch applied. Thanks, Warner! We all should go and do our homework on make-fu :) -- Alex Kapranoff, Voice: +7(0832)791845 We've lived 12 weeks in the brand new millenium... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010326230522.A5834>