From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 22:02:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4599B16A4BF for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 22:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FB14400F for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 22:02:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@soith.com) Received: from www.fastmail.fm (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018751650AB; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 01:01:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 10.202.2.132 ([10.202.2.132] helo=www.fastmail.fm) by messagingengine.com with SMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 01:01:46 -0400 Received: by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix, from userid 99) id E314A3A71E; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 01:01:45 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.2 (F2.71; T1.001; A1.51; B2.12; Q2.03) From: "Aaron Wohl" To: "Terry Lambert" , "Doug White" Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:01:45 -0600 X-Epoch: 1062478906 X-Sasl-enc: E9zoTdu6OrzPXG7v/N+tIg References: <20030901165035.D58395@carver.gumbysoft.com> <3F5400AE.74E1B6F@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <3F5400AE.74E1B6F@mindspring.com> Message-Id: <20030902050145.E314A3A71E@www.fastmail.fm> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: swapon vs savecore dilemma X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 05:02:58 -0000 I usualy have a number of swap partitions since the max size of a swap partition is kind of limited. I was thinking of changing it to do swapon twice. The first time early in the boot would skip mounting any swap areas that had kernel core dumps. Then after the savecore it could do swapon again to mount the rest of the swap areas. Either that or have swaping start to allocate space at the oposite end of the swap space than savecore uses.