From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 17 14:31:49 2011
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id BA588106566C; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:31:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:31:49 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <20111117143149.GA96475@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201111151849.pAFInR3K012609@svn.freebsd.org>
	<20111116.232828.343708041526200614.nyan@FreeBSD.org>
	<4EC3D40A.5040204@freebsd.org>
	<1321457050.78238.10.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu>
	<20111117124210.GB2051@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<1321535020.82271.5.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1321535020.82271.5.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>,
	svn-src-all@freebsd.org, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@FreeBSD.org>,
	Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r227536 - in head: release share/man/man7
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
	<svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:31:49 -0000

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:03:40AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > Or both?  We're heading in the direction of having both for the FTP
> > > server tree.
> > > 
> > > Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"?
> > 
> > Can't we use one if they are equal?
> 
> I'd prefer consistency. [...]

But it looks so plain stupid!

> I picture a higher percentage of people being confused about why some
> architectures have one name while other architectures have two versus
> people being confused about all of them having two names.

And people would have to believe that we as a Project are so dumb that we
could not figure out how to avoid this trivial redundancy when it is clearly
not anywhere being useful.  :-(

./danfe