From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 28 7:13:57 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B4837B401 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:13:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from vivaldi.meteo.fr (vivaldi.meteo.fr [137.129.28.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2E343FAF for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:13:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr) Received: from cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (localhost.meteo.fr [127.0.0.1]) by vivaldi.meteo.fr (8.9.3 (PHNE_22672)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA04353 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:13:35 GMT Received: from xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr (xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.150.2]) by cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16077; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:13:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from cnrm.meteo.fr (mai3.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.157.34]) by xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.7.1) id QAA24233; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:13:08 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3E5F7C82.9A9EA6CD@cnrm.meteo.fr> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:13:06 +0100 From: Igor Pokrovsky X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: osa@freebsd.org.ru Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with getting through firewall using CVSup References: <200302281442.h1SEg0RV042490@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <3E5F77B4.4392E9FD@cnrm.meteo.fr> <20030228151033.GE424@freebsd.org.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (cti825/CNRM) Organization: METEO FRANCE(CNRM) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:52:36PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > > Sergey Osokin wrote: > > > > > > > > Is there any way to make it work? > > > > > To fool firewall? > > > > > > > > Yes, looks like a bad/fool/stupid firewall administriva. > > > > > > I know, there are lots of companies that permit any inside > > > initiated TCP connection. I'd call this stupid if not > > > explicitly decided upon and documented. > > Yes. I agree, maybe this is a good policy. And moreover > > I think that they closed port 5999 on firewall because > > of my activities :-) Perhaps they thought that I'm trying > > do something, which will break their security. Maybe because > > port number is not very popular :-) > > > > > And last - maybe they are running a strict application level > > > gateway like Gauntlet or Sidewinder? If this is the case the > > > admin must define a custom TCP proxy for CVSup, first. > > No. Fortunatly. > > Last idea is use CTM. AFAIK your system administrator think > that 25 port is much more popular for you and other users :-) It seems to me that yes. But can I get whole repository with CTM, as I did with cvsup? -- Igor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message