From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Feb 23 10:56:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA29848 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 10:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA29843 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 10:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14996(5)>; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 10:55:28 PST Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177479>; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 10:55:18 -0800 X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: Charles Henrich cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Woah! cdrom.com! In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 22 Feb 1996 07:42:40 PST." <199602221542.KAA01888@crh.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 10:55:05 PST From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <96Feb23.105518pst.177479@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In message <199602221542.KAA01888@crh.cl.msu.edu>you write: >Why dont they just update the routing tables to send the packets to >WillowSprings instead of to NorthRoyalton ? If you look at the traceroute >a couple messages ago, that should solve the problem. I doubt it; the WillowSprings->Sacramento->SanFrancisco path is among the most heavily overloaded. Bill