Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:10:03 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: net/ntop strip: ... Invalid operation Message-ID: <540A34BB.3080704@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20140905204704.GC9400@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> <540A0781.90609@gmx.de> <20140905203236.GB9400@home.opsec.eu> <540A1E95.4000802@gmx.de> <20140905204704.GC9400@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 05.09.2014 um 22:47 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > >>>>> I understand that net/ntop is unmaintained, but someone perhaps still >>>>> could advise... > >>>> Another suggestion, after checking the website: did you try ntopng yet? > >> Apparently it needs a bit love, upstream seems rather active given the >> latest file release dates in August. Haven't checked in depth. > > I had a quick look at it, it needs more than a little bit to get it > up to 1.2.0. > I believe SVN r367396 fixes the net/ntop build problem, at the price of an additional requisite package, namely binutils, on 8.x releases (or all versions before OSVERSION reached 900033, for that matter). It also fixes a problem when trying to build WITH_SSP_PORTS=yes for hardening. Closes Bug #192047. I am not bumping the portrevision because this fixes build failures only. Janos, thank you for the report. Try upgrading your ports tree a short while after I've sent this message; the port is up to date if it uses .include <bsd.port.post.mk> at its very end. HTH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?540A34BB.3080704>