Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:59:47 -0800 From: Chris <portmaster@BSDforge.com> To: Bob Eager <rde@tavi.co.uk> Cc: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: When to use TMPPLIST instead of pkg-plist? Message-ID: <c59073f1dcc8801421d87509dc8b3863@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20200229194440.70ad674e@raksha.tavi.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:44:40 +0000 Bob Eager rde@tavi=2Eco=2Euk said > On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:29:18 -0800 > Chris <portmaster@BSDforge=2Ecom> wrote: >=20 > > TMPPLIST is an artifact of the QA process when making a port=2E It is > > used for comparison to what you, as a port maintainer claim is the > > pkg-plist, and whats found that looks as the actual plist=2E When a > > discrepancy occurs=2E You're warned, and instructed to make changes as > > required=2E The thing is, because of so many variables, that TMPPLIST > > isn't always correct=2E So to rely on it, as Mathieu stated, would be > > *bad* policy=2E As memory serves; it's also the product of make > > make-plist=2E >=20 > make makeplist >=20 > I believe You believe correctly=2E :) funny it doesn't show up in man ports=2E Thanks for the correction, Bob! --Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c59073f1dcc8801421d87509dc8b3863>