Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 18:53:32 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@vlakno.cz> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of clang on sparc64? Message-ID: <20140913165332.GA98677@vlakno.cz> In-Reply-To: <20140913165135.GA1572@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20140912000406.GA83874@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20140913082322.GA76218@vlakno.cz> <20140913165135.GA1572@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 09:51:35AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:04:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > What's the current status for running clang on sparc64? > > > > Last time we played with this (february?) it was able to compile > > a seemingly working world. So I guess it's not that terribly broken. > > > > We didnt test that much stuff though. > > > > > In particular, flame.freebsd.org is running 10.1-PRERELEASE > > > compiled with gcc 4.2.1. Any chance that clanf can be > > > made available on flame? > > > > I think your best bet is to compile it on flame yourself or crosscompile > > world for sparc64 and use it on flame. > > > > Was your testing with the in-tree llvm/clang or upstream? > Should I try to compile lang/clang35 or lang/clang-devel? > > My main (and perhaps only) interest is to test the ld128 > math libraries functions that I've been writing. In-tree clang is ok. We have backported all the relevant patches. Roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140913165332.GA98677>