From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 16:17:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03271065672; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9830A8FC12; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (proxy6.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.19]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q54G6npJ086573; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1338826010; bh=7tpLimc0kW0pRXhjn8XLE8EpAtkSm8L1dcetNVFntUk=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BfzfdvEnlSwc6JBf8oUmKMuKApQJ326UErAm/FB7kiS1ZtixDCXEDiV4TpfcVYk9U O/FALmcVzC98QjPWSzrI9KbFeEeylXt3XBEF4dqpAouwbA9kyFXmngzn04q+xABK9u I/t1zi8ILRh5gAiEDWG6BMJg0BeCGcYm8vyl/+GM= From: Sean Bruno To: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <4FCB9C41.7010800@freebsd.org> References: <4FCB9C41.7010800@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:06:49 -0700 Message-ID: <1338826009.6117.2.camel@powernoodle-l7> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Milter-Version: master.31+4-gbc07cd5+ X-CLX-ID: 826009002 Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: building kernel modules with XENHVM kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:17:06 -0000 On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 10:17 -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > Hi all, > > Ever since the XENHVM kernel config file was added, it has included > > makeoptions MODULES_OVERRIDE="" > > I don't see any reason for doing this, and I'd like to remove it; I took > it out of the config file I use for EC2 instances a long time ago, and > there are people using e.g., zfs.ko without problems. > > Any objections? > Nope, we're not using it over here at Yahoo either. Sean