Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:39:22 -0400 From: Chris Brennan <xaero@xaerolimit.net> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: perrin@apotheon.com Subject: Re: Vimium on Chromium on FreeBSD Message-ID: <AANLkTikg%2BZ759-3jYvtYXvcJCKzM5AxaFcEQZxqJZAvR@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101105072113.GA5506@guilt.hydra> References: <20101104202523.GA3355@guilt.hydra> <20101105002156.GA4384@guilt.hydra> <AANLkTikSpfKbZ3EOt69Kad_vsDtiZZJ0CyFryjXQmo%2BN@mail.gmail.com> <20101105065541.GC5340@guilt.hydra> <20101105072113.GA5506@guilt.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:55:41AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 08:32:11PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> > wrote: > > > > > > So are there plans to get 7x into ports? I would love to go back to > Chrome > > > as a browser ... I find Firefox so clunky now! :D > > > > Well . . . I have no idea what plans there are for updating the port, > > since I'm not the port maintainer for Chromium. On the other hand, 5.x > > is still smother and nicer than Firefox in many, many ways. The real > > s/smother/smoother/ > > oops > > Fair enough .... I am semi-conscience of security, it's something I do keep in mind and I'm sure portaudit would complain anyway if I did install it ... that would make my e-mail's all the longer. I did come across wiki.freebsd.org/Chromium but it breaks at the patch and that's where I left it (for now) > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikg%2BZ759-3jYvtYXvcJCKzM5AxaFcEQZxqJZAvR>