From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 14 05:27:45 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA05918 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 05:27:45 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA05913 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 05:27:41 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id NAA24554 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:27:38 +0100 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id NAA28081 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:27:37 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id NAA09160 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:26:56 +0100 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199510141226.NAA09160@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: lint To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 13:26:55 +0100 (MET) Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 617 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I'm trying to port Jochen Pohl's NetBSD lint to FreeBSD. The following things are in my way: . The inconsistent handling of _BSD_WCHAR_T in , , and . Is there any particular reason to protect the rune_t declaration from Posix and ANSI sources? . The ANSI-violating definitions for fgets() (second parameter must be int, not size_t) and ftell() (parameter is not const); i'm about to change them. Any opinions? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)