From owner-freebsd-java Sat Mar 27 10:55:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from wrath.cs.utah.edu (wrath.cs.utah.edu [155.99.198.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E748D15138 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 10:55:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gback@cs.utah.edu) Received: from sal.cs.utah.edu (sal.cs.utah.edu [155.99.195.64]) by wrath.cs.utah.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA10791; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:55:38 -0700 (MST) From: Godmar Back Received: (from gback@localhost) by sal.cs.utah.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA19463; Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:55:37 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199903271855.LAA19463@sal.cs.utah.edu> Subject: Re: A BSD-licensed JIT (was Re: Development Projects) To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:55:37 -0700 (MST) Cc: gback@cs.utah.edu, sprice@hiwaay.net, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199903271845.KAA09066@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty" at Mar 27, 99 10:45:44 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org My point exactly ;-) - Godmar > > > > The reasons are the lack of an interface to the threading, exception, and > > gc subsystem which are necessarily to implement high performance > > write barriers for incremental, synchronous and asynchronous precise > > exceptions. > > > > Well the above does not hold true for EF since like Kaffe both are VMs and > can be modified to eliminate the technical obstacle. > > Amancio > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message