From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:08:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3233A1065670; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:08:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAF78FC15; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so2676328gwb.13 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:08:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EfLMaC/AC8XXDP+HKtYpN1Z/ELniFgXm5K1acXZv2rs=; b=bAXSY0zIBAuXiKxHLQ0k6PY27CZ4rTEBxtHVRY/5W1vasifLwpMFFlbY1l6jqeofj9 tzRBbnFvWjeaxB/ScfbigxL0ILFlT9lkh8CcKxtueJ0R3187y9njWRbrfXmTv7cZKC9S iLXk9hUbxfufV8yP4SuDr0c4Vt8RBosannMao= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GkkPKX+LCkVq8lM1AM3B4EY08TKLTSch/Cej/mMXtTqaNLTJRd1GxaUZmtKq376T1S N1olonMvaJIyLkufy4YL9B23zmSup6hAtkrMSowQv9vj/RtZhV2FJCwLo4tc+IojV7Vw 4FeGcrhGE3qJ3cVcrWxO2LN6rtvl8k7nddvBY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.14.39 with SMTP id 39mr4164095agn.127.1301940496804; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.51.14 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:08:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110402084431.GB1849@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20110402084431.GB1849@garage.freebsd.pl> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:08:16 -0700 Message-ID: From: Freddie Cash To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems , FreeBSD-Current , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Any success stories for HAST + ZFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:08:18 -0000 On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote= : > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 01:36:32PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: >> [Not sure which list is most appropriate since it's using HAST + ZFS >> on -RELEASE, -STABLE, and -CURRENT. =C2=A0Feel free to trim the CC: on >> replies.] >> >> I'm having a hell of a time making this work on real hardware, and am >> not ruling out hardware issues as yet, but wanted to get some >> reassurance that someone out there is using this combination (FreeBSD >> + HAST + ZFS) successfully, without kernel panics, without core dumps, >> without deadlocks, without issues, etc. =C2=A0I need to know I'm not >> chasing a dead rabbit. > > I just committed a fix for a problem that might look like a deadlock. > With trociny@ patch and my last fix (to GEOM GATE and hastd) do you > still have any issues? Just to confirm, this is commit r220264, 220265, 220266 to -CURRENT? Looking through the commit logs, I don't see any of these MFC'd to -STABLE yet, so I can't test them directly. The storage box that was having the issues is running 8-STABLE r219754 at the moment (with ZFSv28 and Mikolag's ggate patches). I see there have been a lot of hast/ggate-related MFCs in the past week, but they don't include the deadlock patches. Once the deadlock patches above are MFC'd to -STABLE, I can do an upgrade cycle and test them. I do have the previous 9-CURRENT install saved, just nothing to run it on a= tm. --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com