From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 30 17:46:59 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8B2143
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:46:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.217.182])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9758FC14
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:46:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id b5so545616lbd.13
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=AncKlqkW+q7Ir/Qd0g8sVxyra8pXpuz2dZOGi1DHVCw=;
 b=elvp+iQNP5secrOAxO31UQn0uYgklSa0kHF8wUy2SDRW5zWzJ54C/Gxo6lctujn+4D
 Qx3UiHXNdxvCeA0A7quJ74RGXuKi7JOUztqb4ybCJYjFLBuo0WhR7p+m49e5lxlfvVpi
 hoHdFiuRaKTENmvh8AiqRLjWFyMz0jzL65aXw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=google.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
 bh=AncKlqkW+q7Ir/Qd0g8sVxyra8pXpuz2dZOGi1DHVCw=;
 b=Al9DFUiiYu+tE7LK54BHB+v1WlA1cn1HFpsAak3C0uf5HJgpzE6/kPVipzIRV+pfQ6
 LbgzqdU7+djum/A63OewNvgTHzK1yWiZcQZWDqEshLReXhK8dd41AVPjW/yQKuRKnyLK
 Qdws5kAPC6pf+X6UL4qmp3a1/JBxqIg5S88no3HWvDafGuzaMy/+frab+XwEkQDIzhoa
 QWVHX5pLdgHnq2qtKfXOtb2GYnJeKgV3v4ImFhapYHsaYgbo4YsF4Hxs5KCwAjbOgQ25
 F6xxOVfX9PKS4raJeVAYWl34sWmUUzJQK5Id1XqiLWYX1+3UEQj0hvCQ/o5em5qjJXaA
 mzFg==
Received: by 10.112.48.74 with SMTP id j10mr13672878lbn.94.1351619217446; Tue,
 30 Oct 2012 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.162.71 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGE5yCq1KBbDr61P152QuQ2Qq=1KQqEC=JqpVdeTw2k=Gq=58g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E593932.8060303@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAF6rxgnCPcisTFn37VtYsvHhttQvc1=DxXLuqq7kScJG3UL=cA@mail.gmail.com>
 <C76EF9E9-2F9A-4F49-9ADE-1C7074510BC4@cederstrand.dk>
 <86sj928vks.fsf@ds4.des.no>
 <4FB39F66-0434-43F1-9705-3C81CDF2A25F@cederstrand.dk>
 <86ehkm8s5v.fsf@ds4.des.no>
 <0EF669C7-0ED4-4BD4-9170-C49A7CA91603@cederstrand.dk>
 <20121025193115.GD40357@in-addr.com>
 <CAF6rxgmeJ9Kf-W3hEZwH2qCxoWve0Hqd27aYC=Y4wACyUm8+LQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGE5yCq_SrvcU1FzPN2U1=s+GahVRBOAhE6dy8KAwcG_-TDs+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121030082900.GH3309@server.rulingia.com>
 <35AB4227-2053-4678-BE71-576B01E48FE1@cederstrand.dk>
 <CAJ-VmomWgbQyz-3x9Qsn9woBpEP1P4g7tWGWz53ZMQCPj4y-sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <038C004A-6177-472D-A328-90830E04F640@cederstrand.dk>
 <CAGE5yCq1KBbDr61P152QuQ2Qq=1KQqEC=JqpVdeTw2k=Gq=58g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:46:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkNsUgu87Tv02kL8UETRGqxDLtEsHtMpjCAZFtodk=SSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How about finally replacing GNATS?
To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk6u+BDQEYCvz7Ic5fDboKni8Zb7KYSQhu3cI0H93Yoerpo8rC3ZFHjRY3FinG9JjIpwaoJ
Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
 Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk>,
 "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:46:59 -0000

On 30 October 2012 13:39, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> wrote:
> [..]
>> I'm not suggesting send-pr should go. I even provided a script to keep using it with Bugzilla. I'm just curious what's so great about it in 2012. Offline is a good argument, and HTTP sucks at offline.
>
> But I am.

...


There are good reasons to keep send-pr and good reasons to get rid of
it.   We are not yet at the stage where it even makes sense to discuss
this.

-- 
Eitan Adler