From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 30 17:46:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8B2143 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9758FC14 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id b5so545616lbd.13 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=AncKlqkW+q7Ir/Qd0g8sVxyra8pXpuz2dZOGi1DHVCw=; b=elvp+iQNP5secrOAxO31UQn0uYgklSa0kHF8wUy2SDRW5zWzJ54C/Gxo6lctujn+4D Qx3UiHXNdxvCeA0A7quJ74RGXuKi7JOUztqb4ybCJYjFLBuo0WhR7p+m49e5lxlfvVpi hoHdFiuRaKTENmvh8AiqRLjWFyMz0jzL65aXw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=AncKlqkW+q7Ir/Qd0g8sVxyra8pXpuz2dZOGi1DHVCw=; b=Al9DFUiiYu+tE7LK54BHB+v1WlA1cn1HFpsAak3C0uf5HJgpzE6/kPVipzIRV+pfQ6 LbgzqdU7+djum/A63OewNvgTHzK1yWiZcQZWDqEshLReXhK8dd41AVPjW/yQKuRKnyLK Qdws5kAPC6pf+X6UL4qmp3a1/JBxqIg5S88no3HWvDafGuzaMy/+frab+XwEkQDIzhoa QWVHX5pLdgHnq2qtKfXOtb2GYnJeKgV3v4ImFhapYHsaYgbo4YsF4Hxs5KCwAjbOgQ25 F6xxOVfX9PKS4raJeVAYWl34sWmUUzJQK5Id1XqiLWYX1+3UEQj0hvCQ/o5em5qjJXaA mzFg== Received: by 10.112.48.74 with SMTP id j10mr13672878lbn.94.1351619217446; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.162.71 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:46:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E593932.8060303@FreeBSD.org> <86sj928vks.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4FB39F66-0434-43F1-9705-3C81CDF2A25F@cederstrand.dk> <86ehkm8s5v.fsf@ds4.des.no> <0EF669C7-0ED4-4BD4-9170-C49A7CA91603@cederstrand.dk> <20121025193115.GD40357@in-addr.com> <20121030082900.GH3309@server.rulingia.com> <35AB4227-2053-4678-BE71-576B01E48FE1@cederstrand.dk> <038C004A-6177-472D-A328-90830E04F640@cederstrand.dk> From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:46:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How about finally replacing GNATS? To: Peter Wemm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk6u+BDQEYCvz7Ic5fDboKni8Zb7KYSQhu3cI0H93Yoerpo8rC3ZFHjRY3FinG9JjIpwaoJ Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , Adrian Chadd , Erik Cederstrand , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:46:59 -0000 On 30 October 2012 13:39, Peter Wemm wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > [..] >> I'm not suggesting send-pr should go. I even provided a script to keep using it with Bugzilla. I'm just curious what's so great about it in 2012. Offline is a good argument, and HTTP sucks at offline. > > But I am. ... There are good reasons to keep send-pr and good reasons to get rid of it. We are not yet at the stage where it even makes sense to discuss this. -- Eitan Adler