Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 17:17:59 +0300 From: ovidiue@unixware.ro To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: QoS and guaranteed bandwidth Message-ID: <1116944278.4293379702bfd@webmail.unixware.ro> In-Reply-To: <44k6lou4e4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1116851834.4291ce7aee47a@webmail.unixware.ro> <44k6lou4e4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I know alot about ipfw, dummynet pf, altq and stuff, I am looking for somebody who implemented in on a large scale so I do not waste time with testing and configuring, that's why I've looked for the best solution i know altq is the best but..... is reliable as is HTB or CBQ from linux? Citat Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>: > ovidiue@unixware.ro writes: > > > What is the best sollution (and also simple) to guarantee a bandwidth? > > > > For example if I have an 1024 kbps conection and i want to share > > this to 30 users and also guarantee 32 kbps to every user so if > > one of them is doing intense FTP the others to easely browse the > > net what should I use for that? I am looking for a solution like > > (and better then) HBT on Linux. > > > > I've googled for a while but there are not so many resources on that. > > Try the Handbook; there are several mentions. > > On -STABLE, there are two solid answers: dummynet(4) and altq(4). The > former will be better if you use ipfw(4), the latter if you use pf(4) > [or, I assume, ipf(4)]. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1116944278.4293379702bfd>