From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Sep 27 13:48:44 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA13856 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 13:48:44 -0700 Received: from trepan.io.org (taob@trepan.io.org [198.133.36.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA13848 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 13:48:35 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by trepan.io.org (8.6.9/8.6.9) id QAA25203; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 16:47:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 16:47:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big win for BSD/OS compatibility In-Reply-To: <21697.812106895@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 26 Sep 1995, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Well, how does BSD/OS 2.0 stay compatible with its own 1.1 > > binaries? > > I've been wondering that myself.. :-) Oh, good... I thought I had asked a dumb (but obvious) question. :) > I need to boot my BSDI box and check, but it runs FreeBSD 99.9% of > the time right now so I don't get much hands-on time with BSD/OS... :) I've got the 2.0 sources here which I can poke through when I find some time between rebuilding the news server (with FreeBSD!), getting a dedicated RADIUS authentication server online, fixing a zillion bad name server entries and looking for a place to live. :-/ :) -- Brian Tao System Administrator, Internex Online Inc. "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"