From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 12 05:17:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B1B106564A for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg.stark@sungard.com) Received: from SG2EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (outbound-sin.frontbridge.com [207.46.51.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8948FC13 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg.stark@sungard.com) Received: from mail169-sin-R.bigfish.com (10.3.40.3) by SG2EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (10.3.40.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:17:50 +0000 Received: from mail169-sin (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail169-sin-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F7F120225; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:17:50 +0000 (UTC) X-BigFish: VPS-2(zfebs329ep6cekz542N4015M936fK9371P14e1Jzz1202hzzz2dh6bh61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 Received: by mail169-sin (MessageSwitch) id 1236835069480504_11819; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:17:49 +0000 (UCT) Received: from us-voo-smtp04.internal.sungard.corp (unknown [216.83.166.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail169-sin.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776997A004F; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-voo-smtp12.internal.sungard.corp ([168.162.128.54]) by us-voo-smtp04.internal.sungard.corp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:17:42 -0400 Received: from VOO-EXCHANGE05.internal.sungard.corp ([168.162.128.79]) by us-voo-smtp12.internal.sungard.corp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:17:42 -0400 Received: from 168.162.129.2 ([168.162.129.2]) by VOO-EXCHANGE05.internal.sungard.corp ([168.162.128.88]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:17:39 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Class: Message-ID: <19ab01c9a2d1$dcc881f3$0281a2a8@internal.sungard.corp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Stark, Greg" thread-topic: Release-7.0 named and dhcpd thread-index: Acmi0dzIw9JCEz1QSUa2qTDumOPciQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:17:37 -0400 Importance: normal X-Priority: 3 To: "Olivier Nicole" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2009 05:17:42.0701 (UTC) FILETIME=[DED315D0:01C9A2D1] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Release-7.0 named and dhcpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:17:52 -0000 No, this is my first attempt with named and dhcpd. Each one seems to be = fine separately but getting them to talk has been a stumbling block. Thanks, Greg Greg Stark -- Sent from my Windows Mobile=AE phone. -----Original Message----- From: Olivier Nicole Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:07 AM To: Greg.Stark@sungard.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release-7.0 named and dhcpd Hi Greg, > The desktops that grab an address from the DHCP pool are not getting > added in for named resolution. I am apparently missing something > with the communication between named and dhcpd. Any help would be > appreciated. There are many reasons why the dhcpd cannot communicate with named, it usually resolves to modify and tune the configuration of both. Did you had a working configuration on a previous server that wil lnot work when you upgraded to 7.0? Bests, Olivier