Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 12:27:15 +0100 (BST) From: Paul Richards <paul@netcraft.co.uk> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Cc: gary@palmer.demon.co.uk, terry@cs.weber.edu, paul@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netware gateway. Message-ID: <199508141127.MAA00805@server.netcraft.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199508130912.SAA18403@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Aug 13, 95 06:42:46 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Michael Smith who said > > Nope. Run winsock stacks doing native IP over ethernet alongside the > IPX/whatever stack, put the FreeBSD box on the ethernet with the serial > link out; put all of the internal systems on a fake IP net, disable > routing on the FreeBSD box, and run a socks proxy on it. > This was proposal no 1. I wasn't sure how many socks-aware winsock clients there are though. I've been told that Netscape is. In fact, what I'll probably do is use Novix on the Netware side so that I don't have to worry about allocating ip addresses to each workstation. Novix seems to do teh tunneling job pretty well, it's just the asynchronous NLM which really sucks. -- Paul Richards, Bluebird Computer Systems. FreeBSD core team member. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, http://www.freebsd.org/~paul Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1222 457651 (home)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508141127.MAA00805>