Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:19:06 GMT From: Ganael Laplanche <martymac@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/155180: Cleanup : keeping emulators/mame (only) ? Message-ID: <201103020719.p227J6h5065602@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201103020720.p227K93a095265@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 155180 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Cleanup : keeping emulators/mame (only) ? >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 02 07:20:09 UTC 2011 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Ganael Laplanche >Release: 8.2-RELEASE >Organization: http://contribs.martymac.org >Environment: FreeBSD laptop.martymac.org 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Feb 18 02:24:46 UTC 2011 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >Description: Browsing into mame ports, I've found odd things I'd like to clean up : - emulators/mame-devel has a wrong PORTNAME defined (probably a repocopy of sdlmame-devel) - emulators/mame-devel is not referenced in emulators/Makefile, while sdlmame-devel is Given that : - sdl- ports are older than mame ones (SDL support included in mainstream code, see ports/145050) - both sdlmame-devel and mame-devel have been marked IGNORE - neither mame-devel or sdl-mame-devel is used as a dependency what about leaving only emulators/mame in the ports tree ? This means : - remove emulators/mame-devel from the ports tree - remove emulators/sdlmame-devel from emulators/Makefile and the ports tree >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201103020719.p227J6h5065602>