From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jun 12 22:08:02 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA27467
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 22:08:02 -0700
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA27331
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 22:07:50 -0700
Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <30765>; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 22:08:36 +0100
Date: 	Mon, 12 Jun 1995 22:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To: Atsushi Murai <amurai@spec.co.jp>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: GENERIC kernel & some basic UNIX pointers
In-Reply-To: <9506130434.AA00041@tama3.spec.co.jp.spec.co.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950612220756.20760C-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 13 Jun 1995, Atsushi Murai wrote:

> :  Is that considered good?  Sorry I don't know myself :)  But I get 141ms 
> :on a 28.8k link.  Half of 141 is 70, which is pretty close to 50.  But 
> :that is only comparing 57.6k to 64k.
> 
> I think it's not bad against pppd(kernel-ppp).  process interruption
> will be occured every 10ms(?) as CPU ticks. 

  I should have added that those times are *not* for FreeBSD pppd.

Tom