Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:51:38 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: expat2 in the base system? Message-ID: <20021002115138.GE90861@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <84545.1033548356@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20021002103007.588d3bf3.marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <84545.1033548356@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Poul-Henning Kamp (phk@critter.freebsd.dk): > 2. Under assumed name, "libxmlread" or something. This means that > nothing which doesn't explicitly ask for it will get in touch with > this version of libexpat, and that will only be the programs in > the tree. We don't need to track the official libexpat (sort of > like the DB(3) situation, except with better isolation I guess). This seems to be a nice idea. Can you trim down "our" version of expat to only the libxmlread part or so? This way we don't get too much bloat, the perl fiasco won't happen, and once we've got a working version we can update only for bug fixes. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021002115138.GE90861>