From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 10:00:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F020DB77; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07F1124DB; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.31.9.216] (unknown [213.225.137.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FAF438EB; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 04:59:55 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53A7FA90.5020007@marino.st> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:59:44 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358915 - in head: . Mk References: <201406230957.s5N9vRGX034378@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201406230957.s5N9vRGX034378@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:00:14 -0000 On 6/23/2014 11:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Author: bapt > Date: Mon Jun 23 09:57:27 2014 > New Revision: 358915 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/358915 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r358915/ > > Log: > Remove the IGNOREFILES feature: it was an unsafe feature allowing to use files > fetched from untrusted sources directly into the ports tree > > CR: D269 > Reviewed by: portmgr (antoine) > I'm curious, what happens to the ports that set IGNOREFILES? Did they already get removed? I missed that. John