From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 17:40:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8ED16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:40:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (malcolm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.206.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4687B43D45 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:40:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QHeYHZ072659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from localhost (mikef@localhost) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id j6QHeYTr072656 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU) X-Authentication-Warning: malcolm.berkeley.edu: mikef owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Friedman X-X-Sender: mikef@malcolm.berkeley.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050726103124.S67832@malcolm.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (malcolm.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: fastcgi port fixed but not updated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:40:34 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've recently discovered a problem report for the mod_fastcgi (2.4.2) port: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/79774. The report seems to indicate that the port was fixed shortly after the PR was sent (May 31), yet I just did a cvsup and the buggy port still shows up. I have made the fix to my copy of the port and it does work, but why isn't the fixed version available via cvsup? My cvsup log (run just this morning) shows that the fastcgi Makefile was checked out, yet its date is still early on May 31, apparently just before the fix was done, according to the PR. Anyone know what might be going on? Since the fastcgi port is called by the rt-3.4.2 port (which is my real interest), keeping my fixed version of the former around under a different name is not really a good option, in case I need to update RT. Thanks. Mike _____________________________________________________________________ Mike Friedman System and Network Security mikef@ack.Berkeley.EDU 2484 Shattuck Avenue 1-510-642-1410 University of California at Berkeley http://ack.Berkeley.EDU/~mikef http://security.berkeley.edu _____________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBQuZ1jq0bf1iNr4mCEQIOfACgk8PCCvxZ63wS8fNRkVFo63RYUP8AoJZ1 pYE15oKcDbAnKtDVMKrcBzVi =r/OJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----