From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 12 02:13:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9CC1065677; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (99-115-135-74.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.115.135.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CB58FC15; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id q6C2DEaG038089; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:13:14 GMT (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.2.143] (CiscoE3000 [192.168.1.65]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id v5giep6gjxqts8mbc7398wcia6; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <422C3A88-2AC6-484E-A34D-CC61EB761DC2@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:13:12 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2FFA7683-9919-4BB9-9B65-F49494572FB2@freebsd.org> References: <422C3A88-2AC6-484E-A34D-CC61EB761DC2@FreeBSD.org> To: David Chisnall X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARM at the Cambridge DevSummit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:13:14 -0000 On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:10 AM, David Chisnall wrote: > Hello all of the FreeBSD/ARM flavoured people, >=20 > The Cambridge DevSummit in August will be attended by some people from = ARM, so it would be good to have as many FreeBSD/ARM developers there as = possible. If you haven't signed up yet, please do. >=20 > Please also let me have a list of topics that you'd like to discuss = with people from ARM so that I can try to make sure that relevant people = attend. I won't be able to attend, but after some recent work on ARM booting, I'm very curious if there are emerging conventions (I hesitate to use the word "standards") for how ARM systems boot. Warner's been talking about working towards a true GENERIC kernel on ARM. That looks almost feasible, but we still seem a long ways from being able to build a generic bootloader. Is this likely to change? Tim