From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 12:56:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB4216A4CE; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9370E43D39; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:56:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1BE5C1472F; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:56:05 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:56:04 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Luigi Rizzo In-Reply-To: <20040311124523.A95777@xorpc.icir.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: small@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: "nanobsd" prototype X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:56:05 -0000 > Now i agree that having picobsd in src/picobsd or src/tools > or even ports/sys/* would be a better place Well, if both picobsd and nanobsd are going to exist in the base system, I'd rather see something like src//picobsd and src//nanobsd, to keep the src/ directory from becoming even more confusing. I've taken too many arrows in the back this week to even dream of suggesting a value for :-) mcl